SDNHM Specimen Collection Project

Work to be done (a work in progress)
Discussion

This work plan is only a starting point. Top priority has been given to tasks that must be done before the museum can build their database, so that they can get started. The tasks under 1 a to e and 2 a to c above must be done before the database can be designed.

Many hands make light work. Help! Many of the tasks can be done by one person, and brought to a meeting for approval by the group. Your participation will help us to get all of this done before another season goes by.

I am working on a master species list. It will be used to create a name table, so that the database entry form can include "pull-down" lists of family, genus, and species names. The initial list was created by combining species lists from past fairs and forays. The obvious spelling errors have been weeded out, but the whole list needs to be checked against Arora.

I could use some help in looking up the family name for each genus. It would also be useful to have the higher levels of the taxonomy filled in, to make a reference table for posting on the web site (Kingdom, Division, Subdivision, Class, and Order)

For the plant atlas, the SDNHM database only includes entries that are associated with a specimen in the collection. At our last meeting, we decided to ask the museum to allow two types of records: entries associated with specimens, and entries for observations not supported by a specimen. This would allow us to collect more information about distribution without overloading the specimen collection. Since mushroom specimens cannot be pressed flat like plant specimens, it is probably not practical to house a specimen from every grid square where a species is found. Our feeling is that a few specimens of each species will be adequate for future scientific study. We will make an exception for "unusual" finds, such as species found outside their "normal" habitat, like a woodland mushroom found growing in the desert. These may represent unknown species, or may extend the knowledge about known species.

Collecting information on observations raises one sensitive issue. For most species, we would all be happy to share location information with the public. However, for a few species (the choice edibles) there may be a reluctance to place all locations in a publicly available data base. We should discuss this and decide on an approach.